FIVE-TIER FORMAT MISCONCEPTION DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v9i3.38725Keywords:
Diagnostic Instrument, Five-Tier, Misconceptions, Physics Learning, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
This study aims to identify the types of misconceptions in physics learning and their causes through a systematic literature review. Misconceptions, triggered by internal factors such as incorrect initial understanding and external factors such as inappropriate learning resources, are a major challenge in physics learning. The five-level diagnostic instrument offers an effective solution to comprehensively analyze misconceptions by evaluating students' answers, the reasons behind them, and their beliefs about the answers. A bibliometric analysis of 317 articles (2015–2024) using VOSviewer showed three main themes: students' understanding, diagnostic tool development, and teaching effectiveness. The findings showed that students' misconceptions often occur in abstract physics concepts, such as motion and force. The five-level instrument allows for deeper identification than other instruments, helping teachers to carry out more targeted learning interventions. The results of this study confirm that the use of the five-level diagnostic instrument significantly improves students' understanding of physics concepts and reduces misconceptions. In addition, this study highlights the need to develop more effective diagnostic instruments to support better physics learning processes
Downloads
References
Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Bibliometric using Vosviewer with Publish or Perish (using google scholar data): From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post Covid-19 pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), 19–46.
Ardyan, E., Boari, Y., Akhmad, A., Yuliyani, L., Hildawati, H., Suarni, A., Anurogo, D., Ifadah, E., & Judijanto, L. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di Berbagai Bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Ardyan, E., Boari, Y., Akhmad, A., Yuliyani, L., Hildawati, H., Suarni, A., Anurogo, D., Ifadah, E., & Judijanto, L. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di Berbagai Bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Banawi, A., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., & Solehuddin, M. (2022). Five-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test Development: Empirical Evidences to Improve Students ’ Science Literacy. International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021), 633(Icmr 2021), 131–138.
Budianto, E. W. H. (2022). Pemetaan Penelitian Seputar Akad Musyarakah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah: Studi Bibliometrik VOSviewer dan Literature Review. JESI (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia), 12(1), 25–36.
Budjalemba, A. S., & Listyani, L. (2020). Factors Contributing To Students Difficulties in Academic Writing Class: Students Perceptions. UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v1i2.2966
Carroll, A., Forrest, K., Sanders-O’Connor, E., Flynn, L., Bower, J. M., Fynes-Clinton, S., York, A., & Ziaei, M. (2022). Teacher stress and burnout in Australia: examining the role of intrapersonal and environmental factors. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2–3), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09686-7
Celikkanli, N. O., & Kizilcik, H. S. (2022). A Review of Studies About Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests in Physics Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1291–1311. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.175
De Coster, M., Shterionov, D., Van Herreweghe, M., & Dambre, J. (2023). Machine translation from signed to spoken languages: state of the art and challenges. Universal Access in the Information Society, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00992-1
Du, Y., McNestry, C., Wei, L., Antoniadi, A. M., McAuliffe, F. M., & Mooney, C. (2023). Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems for pregnancy care: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 173(July 2022), 105040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105040
Duda, H. J., Wahyuni, F. R. E., & Setyawan, A. E. (2020). Misconception of the biology education students on the concepts of fermentation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042006
Hamzah, N., Maat, S. M., & Ikhsan, Z. (2021). A Systematic Review on Pupils’ Misconceptions and Errors in Trigonometry. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 11(4), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.20
Haryono, H. E., Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B. K., Zayyadi, M., Kaniawati, I., & Kurtulus, M. A. (2024). E-learning-based collaborative as an effort to reduce high school students ’ misconceptions of heat. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(4), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i4.13222
Kipper, L. M., Furstenau, L. B., Hoppe, D., Frozza, R., & Iepsen, S. (2020). Scopus scientific mapping production in industry 4.0 (2011–2018): a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1605–1627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1671625
Krumphals, I., & Haagen-Schutzenhofer, C. (2021). Development of a Learning Environment to Enhance Preservice Physics Teachers’ Diagnostic Competence in Terms of Students’ Conceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10898
Li, C., Huang, J., & Li, B. (2021). The predictive effects of classroom environment and trait emotional intelligence on Foreign Language Enjoyment and Anxiety. System, 96(xxxx). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102393
Machová, M., & Ehler, E. (2023). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in genetics: origins and solutions. Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1933136
Maison, M., Safitri, I. C., & Wardana, R. W. (2020). Identification of Misconception of High School Students on Temperature and Calor Topic Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument. Edusains, 11(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.11465
Miedema, D., Aivaloglou, E., & Fletcher, G. (2022). Identifying SQL Misconceptions of Novices: Findings from a Think-Aloud Study. ACM Inroads, 13(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514214
Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102
Putri, F. I. (2021). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswi Kelas VII C Dan VII D terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA Fisika. Qalam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 10(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.33506/jq.v
Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. (2017). Students’ misconceptions and other difficulties in introductory programming: A literature review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(1), 1–24.
Rafiq, A. A., Triyono, M. B., Djatmiko, I. W., Wardani, R., & Köhler, T. (2023). Mapping the Evolution of Computational Thinking in Education: A Bibliometrics Analysis of Scopus Database from 1987 to 2023. Informatics in Education, 22(4), 691–724. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.29
Resbiantoro, G., Setiani, R., & Dwikoranto. (2022). A Review of Misconception in Physics: The Diagnosis, Causes, and Remediation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.128
Rinjani, R., & Romadona, D. D. (2023). A Study of Student Science Process Skills: In Formal Change Practices. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 4(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i2.504
Rohmah, M., Priyono, S., & Sari, R. S. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Sma. UTILITY: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi, 7(01), 39–47.
Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Sutrisno. (2023). Five-Tier Instrument to Identify Students’ Misconceptions and Representation: A Systematic Literature Review. Orbital, 15(4), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v15i4.17709
Salsabila, F. N., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Validity and Reliability of Conception Diagnostic Test Using Five-Tier Format for Elasticity Concepts. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v9n3.p439-446
Salvarli, S., I., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). Internet gaming disorder and its associated personality traits: A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 1420–1442.
Sarie, F., Sutaguna, I. N. T., Par, S. S. T., Par, M., Suiraoka, I. P., St, S., Darwin Damanik, S. E., Se, M., Efrina, G., & Sari, R. (2023). Metodelogi penelitian. Cendikia Mulia Mandiri.
Setiaji, B., Mufida, F., & Puspitasari, A. (2023). Perbandingan efektivitas pembelajaran fisika daring dan pembelajaran fisika luring. Jurnal Pendidikan Jarak Jauh, 1(2), 10.
Sidabutar, D., Ningrum, S. S., & Nuryadin, A. (2022). Analisis Bibliometrik Media Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan VOSViewer. Educatio, 17(2), 165–177.
Songkajorn, Y., Aujirapongpan, S., Jiraphanumes, K., & Pattanasing, K. (2022). Organizational Strategic Intuition for High Performance: The Role of Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030117
Winda, F. R., & Shofiardin, M. (2023). Describing the Ability of Science Processes in Basic Physics Practicum II Material of Ice Melting Heat Using E-Modules. Schrodinger:Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v4i1.492
Zainuri, R., & Setiadi, P. B. (2023). Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis: Analisis Swot Dalam Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Jurnal Maneksi (Management Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi), 12(1), 22–28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elza Triani, Azizah Hanum, Ilham Fahlani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.