ANALISIS KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA KANTOR CAMAT KECAMATAN LIMUN KABUPATEN SAROLANGUN

Authors

  • Hazalia Fitri Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jdm.v3i4.25059

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the performance of employees at the sub-district office of Limun District, Sarolangun Regency through 5 main factors. The performance of the five factors is used, namely: Quality, Quantity of Cooperation, Accuracy, and Creativity where Quality: is the degree to which the results of implementing activities are close to perfection or close to the goal what is expected by the company Quantity: is the achievement of work targets in their fields that produce the amount of rupiah, the number of units, the number of activity cycles completed. Collaboration: is the degree to which an employee can carry out a job function with the abilities of the employee so that they can establish good relationships between fellow employees and their superiors. Accuracy: is the degree to which an activity is completed at the desired time by showing the coordination of the output of other people and the time available for other activities or in other words, determination is the effectiveness and efficiency of work on employees. And Creativity: is the degree to which the use of human resources or the ability of employees to create many innovations or new things in completing a job. The analysis used in the performance improvement strategy is qualitative analysis. The data used are primary and secondary data. Data collection procedures were carried out by means of questionnaires, observations and interviews.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bacal, Robert, 1999, performance management. Ahli bahasa, Surya Dharma dan

Yanuar Irawan, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Camat Limun. 2013. Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LAKIP). Kantor Camat Limun. Pulau Pandan.

Donni Juni Priansa, SPd.,SE dan Dr. H. Suwanto, M Si.2011 Manajemen SDM Dalam Organisasi Publik Dan bisnis. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Hasibuan, Melayu S.P. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Hasibuan, Melayu S.P. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta

Kecamatan, Nomor 19 Tahun 2008.Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Tentang Kecamatan. Fokusmedia. Bandung

Mathis dan Jackson, 2002:78, Kinerja Karyawan.

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mangkunegara,A,A. Anwar Prabu. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : PT. Refika Aditama.

Mangkunegara, A,A. Anwar Prabu,2009, Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. PT. Refika Aditama Bandung.

Sedermatanti, 2007:196, Pengukuran Kinerja.

Sekaran, Uma. 2003. Research Methods For Business A Skill Building Approach (second Edition). New York : Jhon Willey & Sons Inc.

Simanjuntak, Payaman J. 2003, Pengantar Ekonomi Sumberdaya Manusia. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Umar, Husien. 2001. Riset Sumber Daya Dalam Organisasi. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utara. Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesian Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Visimedia, Jakarta.

Wursanto, ignatius. 1993. Manajemen Kepegawaian. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Zainuddin Dalam Widyantoro, 1999:54. Operasionalisasi Variabel.

http://www. Google.com. Pengertian Disiplin, Maman Rahman.1999.

http: //en. Wikipedia.org/wiki/analysis.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-15

How to Cite

Fitri, H. (2023). ANALISIS KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA KANTOR CAMAT KECAMATAN LIMUN KABUPATEN SAROLANGUN . Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 3(4), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.22437/jdm.v3i4.25059