ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' THINKING STYLES IN READING FREE-BODY DIAGRAMS AND ANALYTICAL THINKING ON NEWTON'S LAWS

Nikmatu Soleha; Wirawan Fadly; Martinez David

doi:10.59052/edufisika.v10i1.42796

Penulis

Nikmatu Soleha State Islamic University of Ponorogo
Wirawan Fadly State Islamic University of Ponorogo
Martinez David University of Kansa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v10i1.42796

Kata Kunci:

Analytical Understanding, Free-body Diagram, Thinking Style

Abstrak

Analytical thinking skills are essential for understanding and solving physics problems, particularly those involving Newton's Laws. One effective way to develop these skills is through the use of free-body diagrams. This study aims to analyze the influence of students’ thinking styles, Concrete Sequential, Abstract Sequential, Concrete Random, and Abstract Random on their analytical thinking abilities in interpreting free-body diagrams. Conducted using a qualitative descriptive approach at State Junior High School 1 Mlarak, Ponorogo Regency, data collection methods included observation, interviews, and document analysis. The findings reveal that students’ thinking styles significantly affect their ability to comprehend and represent forces in free-body diagrams. Students with a Concrete Sequential style demonstrated a more systematic approach in identifying and organizing forces, while those with an Abstract Random style faced greater challenges in structuring information. These results suggest that visual-based learning, such as the use of free-body diagrams, can enhance physics understanding and analytical thinking skills when aligned with students’ thinking styles. This study serves as an initial effort to support the development of students' analytical thinking skills, especially in the context of visual representation in physics. Additionally, the findings can be used by teachers as a reference for designing instructional strategies that cater to diverse thinking styles, thereby enriching the practice of physics education and promoting higher-order thinking skills.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

‘Iffa, U., Supriana, E., & Sutopo, S. (2019). Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Mengidentifikasikan dan Menggambarkan Diagram Gaya. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(7), 844. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i7.12612

Abdullah, G., Arifin, A., Saro’i, M., & Uhai, S. (2024). Assessing the Influence of Learning Styles, Instructional Strategies, and Assessment Methods on Student Engagement in College-Level Science Courses. International Education Trend Issues, 2(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v2i2.466

Agoestanto, A., & Shufah, N. (2023). Critical Thinking Ability Reviewed from Thinking Style in the Problem Based Learning Model Based on Mathematical Modeling Assisted by Classwiz Emulator. PRISMA, Proceedings of the National Mathematics Seminar, 6(20), 431–439. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/prisma/article/view/66885

Angrasari, F. (n.d.). Hubungan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas X MIA di SMA Negeri 2 Takalar. 6, 225–234.

Anisya, N., Sutarsana, S., Widyawati, T., Hidayat, T., & Mahmudah, I. R. (2024). Analisis Penggunaan Free Body Diagram ( FBD ) Pada Materi Hukum Newton. 1.

Annisa, N., Dwiastuti, S., & Fatmawati, U. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa melalui penerapan Model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing. Journal of Biology Education, 5(2), 163–170. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe

Asis, Alkia Agustami Ria, Y. (2021). Berpikir Analitik dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 2 Teriak. Jurnal Prodi Pendidikan Matematika (JPMM), 3(1), 232–239. https://jurnal.mipatek.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/JPPM/article/download/280/pdf

Azahra, A. P., & Wasis, W. (2024). Remediation of Misconceptions with Student Worksheets Based on Cognitive Conflict on Newton’s Law Material. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v12i1.11532

Bancong, H., & Subaer. (2013). Profil Penalaran Logis Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Peserta Didik H. 2(2), 195–202.

Djajadi, M., Suatu, K., & Tindakan, P. (n.d.). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar The Use of Outdoor Study Methods in Physics Kinematics Learning ( A Classroom Action Research ) Penggunaan Metode Outdoor Study dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. 7, 151–172.

Fatmawati, F., Khaeruddin, K., Haris, A., Palloan, P., & Usman, U. (2022). Relationship Between Learning Styles and Physics Learning Outcomes of Class X Science Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v10i3.8987

Fitriani, F., Wirawan Fadly, & Ulinnuha Nur Faizah. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Analitis Siswa pada Tema Pewarisan Sifat. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i1.64

Groothoff, J. W., Frenkel, J., M, T. G. A., Vreede, W. B., Bosman, D. K., & Cate, O. T. J. ten. (2022). The study of virtual reality adaptive learning method based on learning style model. Wiley Periodicals LLC, 30(2), 369–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03152.x

Hardani, Ustiawaty, J., Andriani, H., Fatmi Utami, E., Rahmatul Istiqomah, R., Asri Fardani, R., Juliana Sukmana, D., & Hikmatul Auliya, N. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. In Yogyakarta: CV. Pustaka Ilmu (Issue Maret).

Hartono, B., & Putra, D. P. (2014). Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar Analisis Proses Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir Dan Kecerdasan Jamak Pada Praktikum Fisika Modern Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. 3, 27–33.

Hasanuddin, H. (2021). Profile Students’ Thinking Style From Perspective Gender In Learning Activity. Jurnal Diversita, 7(2), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v7i2.5977

Ifriliya, L., Hayat, M. S., Roshayanti, F., & Siswanto, J. (2022). Potensi Implementasi Computational Thinking pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 1–14. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej%0APotensihttp://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej%0APotensi

Istiqomah, N., Rokhmani, L., & Yunikawati, N. A. (2022). Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation on Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (ICOSI-HESS 2022). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation on Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (ICOSI-HESS 2022). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-65-7

Kusnaini. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa Kelas X Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Barisan Dan deret Aritmetika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar di SMK BAITUL HIKMAH TEMPUREJO JEMBER.

Lantian, A., Bagneux, V., Delouvée, S., & Gauvrit, N. (2021). Maybe a free thinker but not a critical one: High conspiracy belief is associated with low critical thinking ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3790

Mahyastuti, I., Dwiyana, D., & Hidayanto, E. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 8(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v8i1.19644

Mardini, A., Djamas, D., & Putra, A. (2018). Dampak Penerapan Free Body Diagram Terhadap Kemampuan Peserta Didik Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Hukum Newton Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. Pillar of Physics Education, 11(2), 65–72.

Mariano, M. E. M., Woodman, A., AlNaam, Y., Al-Jamea, L. H., Al-Ansari, R. Y., & Quiambao, J. V. (2024). Assessment of Learning Style Preferences of Saudi Nursing Students. Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 16(01), 010–016. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776016

Masegosa, A. R., Cabañas, R., Maldonado, A. D., & Morales, M. (2024). Learning Styles Impact Students’ Perceptions on Active Learning Methodologies: A Case Study on the Use of Live Coding and Short Programming Exercises. Education Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030250

Mulyani, A. (2017). Penguasaan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi Terhadap Representasi Visual Dalam Botani Phanerogamae. Scientiae Educatia, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v6i1.1376

Niyomufasha, T., Ntivuguruzwa, C., & Mugabo, L. R. (2024). The engineering students’ use of multiple representations in mechanics problems solving at a selected public university in Rwanda. Cogent Education, 11(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2372941

Pranata, O. D. (2024). Analisis Korelasi Kualitas Free-Body Diagram dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Dinamika. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika Dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP), 8(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.19109/rf6wgk84

Pratiwi, I. K., Kusairi, S., & Sunaryono. (2021). Analyzing students’ skill in drawing a free-body diagram. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043440

Qolfathiriyus, A., Sujadi, I., & Indriati, D. (2019). Students’ Analytical Thinking Profile Based on Reflective Cognitive Style in Solving Mathematics Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1306(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1306/1/012016

Rahmawati, E., Rohim, A., & Haryono, H. E. (2024). Analisis Hasil Belajar Siswa Sma Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Field Independent Ellenita. Jurnal Pendidikan Modern. Volume 10 Nomor 01 Tahun 2024, 78-83, 10, 78–83.

Rizkita, N. I., & Mufit, F. (2022). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep dan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Belajar Fisika Pada Materi Hukum Newton Tentang Gerak. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 6(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol6-iss2/599

Rosdianti, C., Subarinah, S., Kurniati, N., & Azmi, S. (2025). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Lingsar Ditinjau dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir Chopifah. Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(maret), 723–731.

Sanusi, D. K., Arafah, K., & Amin, B. D. (2020). Analisis Gaya Berpikir Sekuensial-Acak Abstrak dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online (JPFT), 8(1), 60–66.

Sari, A. L., Parno, & Taufiq, A. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep dan Kesulitan Siswa SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1323–1330. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/11663

Sugiono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (Issue April). Alfabeta.

Suwasono, P., Sutopo, S., Handayanto, S. K., Mufti, N., Sunaryono, S., & Taufiq, A. (2023). Alleviating Students’ Naive Theory on Newton’s Laws of Motion through Problem Optimization and Scaffolding Discussion. Education Research International, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2283455

Syamsuddin. (n.d.). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Media Visual Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Campalagian. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar Implementasi, 5, 129–138.

Tipani, A. (2019). Implementasi STEAM Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Analitis Siswa. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 4, 70–76.

Ummah, M. S. (2015). Harmonization of Science, Technology, and Society (STS) in science Learning to Prepare 21 Century Generation. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Riandi, R., Fadly, W., Wibowo, W. S., Susilowati, E. K. O., Mayasari, T., Andi, H. J., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2019). The problem of pre-service science teachers on newton’s laws topic: A case study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14, 28–38.

Winarti. (2015). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Analisis dan Evaluasi Mahasiswa dalam Mengerjakan Soal Konsep Kalor. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v2i1.2350