COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EOS (EQUATION OF STATES) MODELS FOR FITTING ENERGY VERSUS VOLUME DATA IN THERMODYNAMICS

Authors

  • David Bandhaso Gadjah Mada University
  • Arif Lukmantoro Gadjah Mada University
  • Sholihun Sholihun Gadjah Mada University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jop.v9i2.31973

Keywords:

DFT, Equation of States, Material Design, Thermodynamical Stability,

Abstract

One of the essential aspects of material design research is studying the stability of the model designed. In Thermodynamics, material stability can be expressed by the equation of state (EOS). However, not all EoS will fit with the energy versus volume data from the material being designed. Moreover, if the materials prepared have a unique structure, more factors need to be considered so that the data fitting is carried out more precisely. In this research, a comparative study of 1 mathematical approach (second order polynomial) and 4 EoS (Murnaghan EoS, Birch EoS, Birch EoS, Birch-Murnaghan EoS, and Vinet EoS) was carried out for fitting energy versus volume data on 3D (bulk) and 2D materials. obtained from density functional theory (DFT) calculations. This research found that fitting energy versus volume data in 3D material models can be done using second-order polynomials. In contrast, for 2D models, only two EoS fit (Birch-Murnaghan and Vinet). Apart from that, the result is that the Vinet equation of state is an equation that has the smallest tolerance value in the range of 10-4 - 10-10 eV

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

David Bandhaso, Gadjah Mada University

Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Arif Lukmantoro, Gadjah Mada University

Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

References

Absor, M. A. U., Kotaka, H., Ishii, F., & Saito, M. 2014. Tunable Rashba effect on strained ZnO: First-principles density-functional study. Applied Physics Express, 7(5), 053002. https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.7.053002

Birch, F. 1947. Finite Elastic Strain Of Cubic Crystals. Physical Review, 71(11), 809. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.71.809

Douglas, J. F., & Xu, W.-S. 2021. Equation Of State And Entropy Theory Approach To Thermodynamic Scaling In Polymeric Glass-Forming Liquids. Macromolecules, 54(10), 3247-3269. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00075

Fu, C. L., & Ho, K. M. 1983. First-Principles Calculation Of The Equilibrium Ground-State Properties Of Transition Metals: Applications To Nb And Mo. Physical Review B, 28(10), 5480.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.28.5480

Katsura, T., & Tange, Y. 2019. A Simple Derivation Of The Birch–Murnaghan Equations Of State (Eoss) And Comparison With Eoss Derived From Other Definitions Of Finite Strain. Minerals, 9(12), 745.https://doi.org/10.3390/min9120745

Murnaghan, F. D. 1944. The Compressibility Of Media Under Extreme Pressures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 30(9), 244-247.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.30.9.244

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. 1996. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Physical Review Letters, 77(18),3865.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

Ozaki, T. 2003. Variationally Optimized Atomic Orbitals For Large-Scale Electronic Structures. Physical Review B, 67, 155108.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.155108

Ozaki, T., & Kino, H. 2004. Numerical Atomic Basis Orbitals From H To Kr. Physical Review B, 69, 195113.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.195113

Ozaki, T., Kino, H., Yu, J., Han, M. J., Kobayashi, N., Ohfuti, M., .& Terakura, K. (2009). OpenMx (Open Source Package For Material Explorer) Version 3.8.

Vinet, P., Smith, J. R., Ferrante, J., & Rose, J. H. 1987. Temperature Effects On The Universal Equation Of State Of Solids. Physical Review B,35(4),1945. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.35.1945

Downloads

Published

2024-05-01

How to Cite

Bandhaso, D. ., Lukmantoro, A. ., & Sholihun, S. (2024). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EOS (EQUATION OF STATES) MODELS FOR FITTING ENERGY VERSUS VOLUME DATA IN THERMODYNAMICS. JOURNAL ONLINE OF PHYSICS, 9(2), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.22437/jop.v9i2.31973