BAGAIMANA SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY MENJELASKAN AKSI KOLEKTIF: SEBUAH KAJIAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS MENGGUNAKAN BASIS DATA SCOPUS
Keywords:
Teori Identitas Sosial, Aksi Kolektif, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peran Teori Identitas Sosial (SIT) dalam menjelaskan fenomena aksi kolektif dalam konteks sosial kontemporer. Metode yang digunakan adalah systematic literature review yang mengkaji studi-studi yang dipublikasikan dalam rentang waktu 2014 hingga 2024. Studi yang terpilih dalam review ini berfokus pada penggunaan SIT dalam menjelaskan keterlibatan individu dalam aksi kolektif yang berbasis identitas sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa SIT dapat menjelaskan aksi kolektif dengan menekankan pentingnya identifikasi diri terhadap kelompok. Semakin kuat identifikasi sosial seseorang dengan kelompoknya, semakin besar kemungkinannya untuk terlibat dalam aksi kolektif tersebut. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa SIT memiliki kelebihan dalam konsistensinya dalam memprediksi keterlibatan dalam aksi kolektif. Namun, beberapa kelemahan ditemukan terkait dengan keterbatasan aplikasinya dalam konteks budaya dan kelompok yang berbeda. Kesimpulannya, SIT menawarkan kerangka yang kuat dalam memahami motivasi individu untuk berpartisipasi dalam aksi kolektif, namun diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut untuk mengatasi kelemahan dalam penerapannya di berbagai konteks sosial yang lebih luas.
Downloads
References
Abrams, D., Travaglino, G. A., Grant, P. R., Templeton, A., Bennett, M., & Lalot, F. (2020). Mobilizing IDEAS in the Scottish Referendum: Predicting voting intention and well‐being with the Identity‐Deprivation‐Efficacy‐Action‐Subjective well‐being model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12355
Ayers, S., Wright, D. B., & Thornton, A. (2018). Development of a Measure of Postpartum PTSD: The City Birth Trauma Scale. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00409
Badea, C., Binning, K. R., Sherman, D. K., Boza, M., & Kende, A. (2021). Conformity to group norms: How group-affirmation shapes collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104153
Blacklivesmatter. (2025). About Black Lives Matter. Blacklivesmatter.Com. https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/#vision
Bogart, K. R., Rottenstein, A., Lund, E. M., & Bouchard, L. (2017). Who self-identifies as disabled? An examination of impairment and contextual predictors. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(4), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000132
Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Güler, M., & Heath, A. (2016). Predicting Support for Collective Action in the Conflict Between Turks and Kurds: Perceived Threats as a Mediator of Intergroup Contact and Social Identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(6), 732–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641303
Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Chan, M. (2014). Social identity gratifications of social network sites and their impact on collective action participation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12068
Dahling, J. J., Wiley, S., Fishman, Z. A., & Loihle, A. (2016). A stake in the fight: When do heterosexual employees resist organizational policies that deny marriage equality to LGB peers? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.11.003
Der Waldt, G. Van. (2020). Constructing conceptual frameworks in social science research. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v16i1.758
Di Bernardo, G. A., Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., McKeown, S., Cocco, V. M., Saguy, T., & Dixon, J. (2021). Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219889134
Foster, M. D., Tassone, A., & Matheson, K. (2021). Tweeting about sexism motivates further activism: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12431
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews.
Hedges, A. P. S. A. N. D. A. M. W. A. N. D. L. V. (2018). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self‐categorization Theory: A Historical Review. In Social and Personality Psychology Compass (Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 204–222). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. 2.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417
Klandermans, B., & Stekelenburg, J. V. (2014). Why People Don’t Participate in Collective Action. Journal of Civil Society, 10(4), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2014.984974
Lange, P. A. M. Van, Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2011). Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Collection: Volumes 1 & 2. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=SePipgh2z7kC
Mikołajczak, G., & Becker, J. C. (2022). Supporting men or male privilege? Women’s progressive and reactionary collective action for men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(7), 1064–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2887
Morthon, T. A., & Duck, J. M. (2001). Communication and Health Beliefs. Communication Research, 28(5), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005002
Nicholls, M. (2007). Discovering Gunpowder Plot: The King’s Book and the Dissemination of News. Recusant History, 28(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034193200011456
Okines, A. W. R. E. (2004). Why Was There So Little Government Reaction to Gunpowder Plot? In The Journal of Ecclesiastical History. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022046904009911
Putra, I. E., Wagner, W., Holtz, P., & Rufaedah, A. (2021). Accounting for a riot: Religious identity, denying one’s prejudice, and the tool of blasphemy. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5565
Setiawan, T., Scheepers, P., & Sterkens, C. (2020). Applicability of the social identity model of collective action in predicting support for interreligious violence in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12397
Syarif, A. S., & Halida, R. (2025). Aksi Kolektif Pada Gerakan Sosial: Sebuah Perspektif Psikologi. Psyche: Jurnal Psikologi, 7(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.36269/psyche.v7i1.2783
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Political Psychology (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
Thomas, E. F., Zubielevitch, E., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Testing the Social Identity Model of Collective Action Longitudinally and Across Structurally Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219879111
Thonhauser, G., & Weichold, M. (2021a). Approaching Collectivity Collectively: A Multi-Disciplinary Account of Collective Action. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740664
Thonhauser, G., & Weichold, M. (2021b). Approaching Collectivity Collectively: A Multi-Disciplinary Account of Collective Action. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740664
Travaglino, G. A., Abrams, D., & Russo, G. (2017). Dual routes from social identity to collective opposition to criminal organisations: Intracultural appropriation theory and the roles of honour codes and social change beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216682351
Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Identity Expression Through Collective Action: How Identification With a Politicized Group and Its Identity Contents Differently Motivated Identity-Expressive Collective Action in the U.S. 2016 Presidential Elections. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(3), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220933406
Van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479314
Weichold, M., & Thonhauser, G. (2020). Collective Affordances. Ecological Psychology, 32(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2019.1695211
Wiley, S., Srinivasan, R., Finke, E., Firnhaber, J., & Shilinsky, A. (2013). Positive Portrayals of Feminist Men Increase Men’s Solidarity With Feminists and Collective Action Intentions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464575
Women’s March. (2025). Our feminist future. Women’s March.
Wright, J. D., Schmitt, M. T., Mackay, C. M. L., & Neufeld, S. D. (2020). Imagining a sustainable world: Measuring cognitive alternatives to the environmental status quo. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101523
Zomeren, M. van, Kutlaca, M., & Turner-Zwinkels, F. M. (2018). Integrating Who “We” Are With What “We” (Will Not) Stand For: A Further Extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 122–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Akhmad Saputra Syarif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
