Analisis Profil Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA kelas XI melalui Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving
(Analysis of the Scientific Reasoning Ability Profile of Class XI High School Students through the Creative Problem Solving Learning Model)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i4.19054Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the level of scientific reasoning ability of high school students in class XI through the Creative Problem Solving Learning model on the respiratory system material. This study uses a quantitative descriptive method. The sample was not chosen at random but with a specific purpose, namely by using a purposive sampling technique, totaling 35 students. The research instrument used in this study is the question of scientific reasoning ability, a modification of the questions developed by Lawson, namely LCTRS (Lawson Classroom Test Of Scientific Reasoning). The questions used are 10 multiple choice questions with 6 indicators. The results of the study show that gender does not affect a person's scientific reasoning ability. The average score shows the level of scientific reasoning of male students and female students, which has the same percentage, namely 71%, which means that it is included in the good category. The highest score of the level of scientific reasoning in male students is the Correlation Reasoning indicator with a total percentage of 84% female students also the highest score is found in the correlation indicator but the percentage is slightly different, lower than male students, namely 82%.
Key words: scientific reasoning, gender, creative problem solving
Â
ABSTRAK
Tujuan dari penelitian yaitu untuk mengetahui tingkat kemampuan penalaran ilmiah siswa SMA kelas XI melalui model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving pada materi sistem pernapasan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Sampel yang dipilih tidak secara acak melainkan dengan tujuan tertentu yaitu dengan Teknik Purposive sampling yang berjumlah 35 orang siswa. Instrument penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu soal kemampuan penalaran ilmiah modifikasi dari soal yang dikembangkan oleh Lawson yaitu LCTRS (Lawson Classroom Test Of Scientific Reasoning). Soal yang digunakan berjumlah 10 soal pilihan ganda beralasan dengan 6 indikator. Dari hasil penelitian menunjukan gender tidak mempengaruhi kemampuan penalaran ilmiah seseorang. Â Skor rata-rata menunjukan tingkat penalaran ilmiah siswa laki-laki dan siswa perempuan yaitu memiliki persentase yang sama yaitu 71% yang artinya termasuk kedalam kategori baik. Skor tertinggi tingkat penalaran ilmiah pada siswa laki-laki yaitu pada indikator Penalaran korelasi dengan jumlah persentase 84% siswa perempuan juga skor tertingginya terdapat pada indikator korelasi tetapi jumlah persentase nya sedikit berbeda lebih rendah dari siswa laki-laki yaitu 82%.Â
Kata kunci: penalaran ilmiah, gender, creative problem soving
Downloads
References
Agustina, D. (2007). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) untuk Meningkatkan Scientific Reasoning Siswa SMP Pada Hukum Pascal. Doctoral Dissertation Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Azmi, D. T. U., Astutik, S., & Subiki, S. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran (Cc) Berbasis Scaffolding Terhadap Kemampuan Scientific Reasoning Fisika Siswa Sma. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 10(1), 1833. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v10n1.p1833-1843
Bhat, M. A. (2014). Construction And Evaluation of Reliability And Validity of Reasoning Ability Test. International Journal of Education Studies, 01(02), 47–52.
Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A., Savinainen, A., & Steinert, J. J. (2008). Comment on “The effects of students†reasoning abilities on conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in introductory mechanics’. European Journal of Physics, 29(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/29/5/L01
Fawaiz, S., Handayanto, S. K., & Wahyudi, H. S. (2020). Eksplorasi Keterampilan Penalaran Ilmiah Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i7.13721
Han, J. (2013). Scientific Reasoning: Research, development,and assesment. (Issue June).
Hejnová, E., Eisenmann, P., Cihlář, J., & Přibyl, J. (2018). Relations between Scientific Reasoning and Culture of Problem Solving. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110203
Holyoak, KJ; Morison, R. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, July, 858. http://books.google.com/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=znbkHaC8QeMC&pgis=1
Ikhwan, M., Saad, M., Baharom, S., & Mokhsein, S. E. (2017). International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences Scientific reasoning skills based on socio-scientific issues in the biology subject. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(3), 13–18.
L, K., & McNeill Joseph, K. (2008). Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping students use evidence and reasoning. Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting, 121–134.
Lawson, A. E. (2004). The Nature and Development of Scientific Reasoning: A Synthetic View. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2
Mandella, S., Suhendar, S., & Setiono, S. (2021). Kemampuan Awal Penalaran Ilmiah Peserta Didik SMA berdasarkan Gender Pada Materi Ekosistem. Biodik, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i2.12795
Nur, G. nova sudrajat. (2020). Perempuan dalam Femininitas dan feminitas baru. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101607%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034%0Ahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cjag.12228%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104773%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.011%0Ahttps://doi.o
Pepkin, K. L. (2000). Creative Problem Solving in Math. TAPPI - Polymers, Laminations and Coatings Conference, 1, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.2.2.0096
Piraksa, C., Srisawasdi, N., & Koul, R. (2014). Effect of Gender on Student’s Scientific Reasoning Ability: A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.245
Saptono, S., Rustaman, N. Y., Saefudin, & Widodo, A. (2013). Model integrasi atribut asesmen formatif (IAAF) dalam pembelajaran biologi sel untuk mengembangkan kemampuan penalaran dan berpikir analitik mahasiswa calon guru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2507
Sari, L. I., Zulhelmi, & Azizahwati. (2015). An Analysis Scientific Reasoning Ability of Class X Student Sma Negeri at Tampan District Pekanbaru in Subject Work and Energy. Jom Fkip, 6(2), 1–14.
Shofiyah, N., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Jatmiko, B. (2013). Mengembangkan penalaran ilmiah (Scientific reasoning) siswa melalui model pembelajran 5E pada siswa kelas X sman 15 surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2514
Tajudin, M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). Relationship between Scientific Reasoning Skills and Mathematics Achievement among Malaysian Students. GEOGRAFIA Online Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(1).
Zeineddin, A., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2010). On coordinating theory with evidence: The role of epistemic commitments in scientific reasoning among college students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75315
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nabillah, Suhendar, Setiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, copyright is retained by the authors and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
